Ghostlighting: The Dating Trend That Combines Ghosting and Gaslighting
Editorial Team9 min readUpdated 9 Aug 2026
Loading…
Loading…
You've been texting someone for weeks. Then, nothing. No fight, no explanation, just silence. A month later they resurface with a casual "hey stranger 👋" as if no time has passed at all — and if you bring up the disappearance, they act confused, minimize it, or insist you're misremembering how long it's been.
That two-part experience — vanish, then deny the vanishing ever mattered — is what relationship writers have started calling ghostlighting. It's not a clinical diagnosis. It's a portmanteau, coined to describe a pattern that a lot of daters have lived through but didn't have a name for until recently. And it's having a moment: Forbes covered the trend again this spring, building on a widely shared Psychology Today piece that first named it a few years back.
This article breaks down what ghostlighting actually is, what research on its two component parts says about why it happens and how it affects people, and what a grounded, non-dramatic response looks like if you're on the receiving end of it.
Ghostlighting combines two familiar relationship behaviors. Ghosting is the abrupt, unexplained end of communication with someone you were actively talking to or dating. Gaslighting is a manipulation pattern where someone's statements cause another person to doubt their own memory, perception, or judgment. Ghosting refers to the sudden disappearance of someone you've been dating, with no warning or explanation, leaving the other person to spend a lot of time wondering what they might have said or done. Ghostlighting layers the second behavior on top of the first: the person disappears, and if they come back or the disappearance gets addressed, they respond by denying, minimizing, or rewriting what happened rather than acknowledging it plainly.
This is worth saying clearly, in a sentence you could hand to anyone asking "wait, what is ghostlighting": ghostlighting is when someone ends contact without explanation, then—if confronted or if they resurface—makes the other person doubt whether the disappearance happened the way they remember it, rather than owning it.
It's a useful term precisely because it names something more disorienting than ghosting alone. Being ghosted hurts, but at least the facts are usually clear: someone stopped responding. Ghostlighting adds a second layer of confusion on top of the original hurt, because now the person is also being asked to distrust their own account of events.
Ghosting itself is well studied at this point. A systematic review of research on ghosting in emerging adults' relationships found that people who ghost others tend to show more avoidant attachment patterns, along with a strong need for closure and certain personality traits, while people on the receiving end of ghosting tend to show more anxious attachment and higher levels of comparing themselves to others. Separately, a multi-study analysis published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships found that people who had ghosted someone, been ghosted, or both reported meaningfully higher attachment anxiety and higher attachment avoidance than people with no ghosting history in either direction.
Gaslighting has its own separate research base, mostly in the context of chronic, patterned relationships rather than single incidents. Psychology Today's coverage of long-term gaslighting notes that repeated exposure causes victims to doubt their own reality and stay on edge anticipating the next incident, and that recent research has found a direct, harmful link between sustained gaslighting exposure and mental health. It's worth noting that gaslighting isn't a formal clinical diagnosis either — it doesn't appear in the DSM-5 or ICD-11, and the APA's own dictionary frames it as a descriptive term for a pattern of manipulation and coercive control rather than something a person clinically "has."
Ghostlighting sits at the intersection of these two well-documented patterns, which is part of why the term resonated when it started circulating: it gives people language for an experience — disappearance followed by denial — that existing single-word terms didn't quite capture on their own.
It's tempting to assign a single motive, but the honest answer from the research is "it depends." The attachment research above suggests that people who ghost more often skew toward avoidant attachment styles — a pattern associated with discomfort around emotional closeness and a preference for exiting situations rather than having direct conversations about them. When ghosting is followed by denial or minimizing rather than acknowledgment, that can reflect either genuine discomfort with confrontation, a habit of avoiding accountability, or — in some cases — a more deliberate pattern of control. Different sources, and different situations, will land in different places on that range, which is exactly why it's more useful to focus on your own response than to try to diagnose someone else's psychology from the outside.
Two things compound here. First, there's the disorientation that comes with any unexplained disappearance. Second, if the person later denies, minimizes, or rewrites what happened, it adds a layer of self-doubt on top of an already confusing situation. That combination — abandonment plus having your account of events questioned — is what makes ghostlighting land differently than a plain breakup or a single ghosting incident.
If you recognize this pattern in a relationship, it's worth taking seriously rather than shrugging off as "just dating stuff." Gaslighting can be difficult to detect because there's often no physical evidence, and over time, unaddressed, it can contribute to ongoing anxiety and depression. That doesn't mean every instance of someone resurfacing after silence is abusive — plenty of ghosting is thoughtless rather than calculated — but a repeated pattern of disappearing and then denying or minimizing it is worth naming clearly rather than explaining away.
A few grounded steps, drawn from relationship counselors and therapists who work with clients on this specific pattern:
Don't outsource the facts of what happened. If someone insists a three-week silence was "like, a few days," you don't need to win the argument — you also don't need to accept their version. You're allowed to simply know what you experienced.
Decide what you want before you decide what to say. Whether you choose to give someone a second chance or walk away for good, neither decision makes you the villain of the story — trust your own instincts and don't let anyone rush your decision.
A boundary doesn't require a speech. Setting a boundary doesn't always require an in-depth conversation — if renewed contact isn't something you want, simply not responding communicates that clearly enough. If you do want to say something, keep it short and about your own limits ("I'm not looking to pick this back up") rather than a case you're building for them to concede to.
Redirect the "why" energy toward yourself. Instead of spending all your mental energy on why the other person did what they did, it can help to ask what the moment teaches you about your own needs — for example, that consistency is a non-negotiable going forward.
Get outside perspective if the self-doubt lingers. Talking through the experience with people who know and accept you — friends, family, or a therapist — helps because having your experience heard and validated is often the key part of moving through it.
None of this requires cutting the person off with dramatic finality or treating every ghosting incident as a five-alarm red flag. It's simply about not letting someone else's account overwrite your own memory of what happened, and choosing your next move from a clear head rather than a confused one.
[INTERNAL LINK: how attachment styles shape the way you fight and make up]
You don't need a perfect comeback text or a viral term to know when something felt off. If you're navigating a ghostlighting pattern right now, the most useful next step is usually the smallest one: write down, privately, what actually happened — dates, what was said, how long the silence lasted — before anyone else's version has a chance to blur it. That's not overkill. It's just keeping your own account of your own life intact.
If this piece named something you've lived through, we'd genuinely like to hear about it in the comments — and if you want more on the attachment-style side of all this, our piece on how attachment styles shape conflict and repair is a natural next read.
What to do right now If this piece named something you've lived through, we'd genuinely like to hear about it in the comments — and if you want more on the attachment-style side of all this, our piece on how attachment styles shape conflict
Ghostlighting: The Dating Trend That Combines Ghosting and Gaslighting Ghostlighting: The Dating Trend That Combines Ghosting and Gaslighting can improve when you apply one clear step consistently and track progress for at least two weeks.
You've been texting someone for weeks. Then, nothing. No fight, no explanation, just silence.
You've been texting someone for weeks. Then, nothing. No fight, no explanation, just silence.
Ghosting itself is well studied at this point. Ghostlighting: The Dating Trend That Combines Ghosting and Gaslighting can improve when you apply one clear step consistently and track progress for at least two weeks.
It's tempting to assign a single motive, but the honest answer from the research is "it depends.
Two things compound here. First, there's the disorientation that comes with any unexplained disappearance.
Psychology Today — "The Doubly Troubling Phenomenon of Ghostlighting" Forbes — "What's Behind The 'Ghostlighting' Dating Trend" (Bruce Lee, 2026) Psychology Today — "3 Ways Gaslighting Impacts Long Term Mental Health" Powell, D.
Found this helpful? Tap like — it helps us know what readers enjoy.
Share your thoughts. Comments appear after a quick review.
Loading comments…
Reader membership
Want bonus guides and early access? Purchase a Thinkora Reader Pass.
Keep reading
Bookmark this site, explore more in the same lane, or tell a friend who overthinks at 2 AM — that is how good ideas spread without ads.
